NBC’s ‘Siberia’ bumped off the schedule for Royal Baby coverage
There is something both hilarious and simultaneously sad about the following bit of news: A show that actually had a crew of people working hard to create a new series has been replaced … by a baby that no one knows anything about. All we know is that it’s a boy, and that its parents just so happen to be the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, but other then that there’s nothing.
NBC confirmed Monday that they have pulled their new episode of “Siberia” until next week, and replaced it with a one-hour special hosted by Natalie Morales where they chronicle anything and everything related to the son of William and Kate, who is now going to be third in line for the throne behind only William and Prince Charles.
To be fair, the Royal Baby is an enormous event in Britain, and the child could shape the entire course of the country’s history; but is there really anything that we’re going to learn about this child tonight that has already not been barfed up on the screen 100 times already today? This is nothing more than an easy attempt to get ratings with the news of the day; “Siberia” is watched by about as many people who you imagine actually live in Siberia per square mile, and NBC wants to find a way to capitalize. Plus, it’s ideal counter-programming against “Under the Dome,” given that most of the people who watch that show probably wish that most celebrity news would be trapped under a dome somewhere.
With this story, we hereby both begin and end our coverage of the Royal Baby for the day … unless of course something else ridiculous happens that we are able to poke fun at down the road. When you have a “show” like this, anything is really possible.
Photo: NBC
mjm
July 25, 2013 @ 12:06 am
Okay but why not lets us, the ones who do watch Siberia and like it know what is up? And if the above is true that not that many watch, then will we who do be left in a lurch as we were with shows like PanAm which we liked a lot?
L. Zee
July 24, 2013 @ 10:19 pm
siberia is so good though i hope they don’t cancel it
Mr. Lead
July 24, 2013 @ 12:37 am
Boo Hiss, I think we get enough news shoveled down our throats. Plus I personally don’t give two cents about a damn birth.
Guest - Siberia Appreciator
July 23, 2013 @ 5:10 am
I see why Siberia would get bad ratings, but I love that show now, and frankly, coverage on the royal baby doesn’t involve lions and deceit.
Swolfmoon
July 23, 2013 @ 4:40 am
Imagine my surprise when I went to watch my recorded Siberia to find a freaking news thing about the Royal family. I am beyond annoyed. I don’t care if its got low ratings, I like it and I should have been able to watch the show they have been hyping up all day…if I wanted to watch a news piece about the Royals, and their newest addition, I would have tuned into a different channel to do so. Ugh.
Rick
July 23, 2013 @ 3:29 am
I watched a little of the coverage and it was more about Princess Diana than the baby. And it was basically dreadful. A bad decision by NBC.
sharon
July 23, 2013 @ 3:25 am
I am not going to watch the royal baby–could care less.
Biff
July 23, 2013 @ 2:06 am
If only there were 24-hour news channels run by the major networks (like MSNBC) that could cover the event and leave the original programming alone…