‘The Walking Dead’ season 4: Is a prequel really the best idea for a spin-off?
Well, the latest rumor out there suggests that the leading idea for the show (which would not be on the air likely until 2015) would be to focus it by and large on some of the early days of the epidemic. While this is still in the early stages, TVLine claims that this is an idea that the producers and AMC are really toying with, especially since it gives so much more insight into the world and even informs the other show.
Personally, we see one major advantage and disadvantage to this idea almost right away.
The Good – This is an opportunity for the spin-off to really differentiate itself from the original, especially since one of our earlier concerns with the show was that it would be “The Walking Dead,” just set in a different place like Los Angeles or a colder climate. Showing the beginning of the story helps to enrich both products.
The Bad – This feels more like a limited series than a full-fledged show, unless you are showing those responsible for starting the outbreak in the first place try to find a way to save humanity in the end. That would be a little bit intriguing, especially if you could make it that these people end up curing and helping the other characters on the flagship show. But, all of that seems unlikely.
Where do you stand on the idea of a “Walking Dead” origin story; do we really need to know why it happened? If you want to simplify things and just preview Sunday’s episode, click here to check out some scoop on David Morrissey and The Governor.
Photo: AMC