‘Survivor: Blood vs Water’: Five ways to improve for season 27
So was “Survivor Caramoan: Fans vs. Favorites” a great experience? While we’ve still yet to include it in our season rankings (though this and our updated winner rankings will be online by Thursday), we can at least give the show a smile for not completely stinking up the place after a weak start. The pre-merge was predictable and littered with characters more bent on creating a fuss than actually playing the game, but the post-merge game really lightened things up and had a run of several exceptional episodes in a row.
Even if this was the best season of the show ever (which it wasn’t), there is always room for improvement. We know that next season is entitled “Survivor: Blood vs. Water,” and there’s no changing that. Meanwhile, there’s also likely no changing the twist that is probably going to be returning players competing against family members. Like it or not (and luckily, we like it in theory), it’s not going anywhere.
What we have instead now are five suggestions that the show can still change if they want to put the time and effort in. Some are big, some are small, and you’ll probably disagree with some of them. Hey, isn’t that what the comments are for?
1. Story arc concentration – While we were given four episodes of near-constant Shamar and about the same of Brandon Hantz, “Survivor” did not bother to show us the actual injury that caused Erik Reichenbach to start to wither away, and instead almost made it look like he was losing his mind and was ready to go home. Meanwhile, Brenda Lowe was ignored for so long, we thought that she had been replaced by that rock Francesca threatened to eat. We know that there are some characters meant to be larger than others, and we’re not looking for parity. We are at least hoping for justification on alliances, strategies, and if someone does leave due to injury, more insight into what actually happened. “Survivor: Philippines” was fantastic with its balance, but the first part of “Caramoan” was almost insufferable.
2. Rethinking the swap – First of all, we don’t want any swap if this really is a Family vs. Favorites season, since that immediately will shift the balance and make things unfair for people who have their family member still in the game. But even if you do it, the whole drawing eggs and smashing them, which cool visually, is terrible for fairness. Do a schoolyard pick, or have the contestants all rank each other! There’s drama to be had here, especially when the tribes are closer to being fair.
3. The jury should start at the merge – Enough said. We really liked the show when they made this change semi-permanently, and we felt deprived of great entertainment to see Corinne kicked off after the merge, and not being allowed to vote for the winner.
4. Scrap the whole final 4 double-immunity – While it’s possible (see Malcolm) that someone can win an advantage and still lose that last immunity challenge, we still think that having someone with an edge ruins some of the tension that is otherwise there by four competitors entering the last challenge with equal footing. Imagine how different “Survivor: Palau” may have went had Tom entered the challenge with an advantage.
5. Never do a reunion show like Sunday’s ever again – We appreciate that “Survivor” takes risks rather than phoning it in, and we hope they keep thinking outside of the box since it brought us the hidden immunity idol, exile island, and some other interesting twists over the years. But to shaft the pre-jury people from being on stage, whatever the reason for it, felt like a sham and a travesty to these people who traveled out there , got dressed up, and then found out they would get zero camera time. Sure, they are paid to attend, but it’s not what any of them expected. A terrified little girl had more airtime than Matt, Corinne, or Francesca, and they were all interesting players who deserved to be on stage. Even if you don’t have a line, you deserve to sit up there and smile with the rest of the cast. It’s not a reunion if only half of the cast is featured!
Oh, and the fact that Erik didn’t get to update anyone on his health was pretty horrible, as was almost entirely ignoring Sherri despite her finishing third. If we took out the little girl, Boston Rob promoting himself, and Rudy missing the boat about the public perception of the word “queer,” at least a few more people could have gotten a chance to speak.
In case you missed all of our “Survivor Caramoan” finale coverage, including interviews with the finalists and also our own casting dreams for the new season, the link here has all of it for you tied up in a neat little bow.
Photo: CBS
john
June 12, 2013 @ 11:48 pm
What I like to see in next seasons, is more of the survival aspect of the game. There is no more the role of the provider in the tribe. I liked a lot when an underdog player saved the day by catching a big fish or something like that.
Why not: survivor hardcore/crash, where players only had the remains of a plain or a boat, no food (rice, beans, etc…), and no tools.
And the players, must built a raft and go to a little island 15 mph into see, whore the ones making to the merge or something like that.
Pitchfire
May 17, 2013 @ 4:04 pm
I would like to see a season where a nice person can win. Real relationships are formed but it’s still a game and everything rests on that premise. Yet somehow Dawn was villified for forming a deeper relationship and then playing it. In that sense she did so well at Survivor that even Jeff Probst basically castigated her on the reunion show for playing the game instead of honoring what he asserted somehow transcended the game? Does that not make that action of of the best Survivor blindsides, if not the best ever? Dawn’s game play didn’t get anything near the credit it deserved. She was solely instrumental in several key betrayals whereas Chocran just went along and played the chessmaster while not really doing much. Meanwhile Malcolm takes credit for being the best strategic player, yet he forms and betrays many loose relationships and is never able to form deep friendships to his advantage? Survivor has created it’s own paradigms such that it cannot see beyond and has outwitted itself in doing so.
Lewis Hill
May 15, 2013 @ 10:11 pm
Hello
I think the rest of the cast was not up on stage because of the conflict between Brandon and Phillip. I think they did not want to have the whole cast up there with the exception of Brandon and have to explain why he was not there. I read on one website Brandon was banned from attending. Do your own research, see what you find out.
As for point three I think that survivor has no set merge time. In heros vs villains we saw them merge at 10. Courtney and Coach made the jury and not the merge. In survivor redemption island there was a merge at 12. The numbers came out this time where someone missed the jury and made the merge.
forgottenn8
May 15, 2013 @ 7:44 pm
Completely agree with all of the points too. Especially 1.
I agree that it doesn’t have to be exactly equal screentime between everyone, however more balance would certainly also add far more to the suspense of possible winners. The ‘story arc’ edit clearly elminitated so many contestant from being winners, that after Andrea got voted out it was a for sure Cochrane because no one else who remained was getting an edit satisfying for a winner. Even if they did stand a chance, the editing pretty much ruined the suprise for us.
Still thought it was an entertaining season though.
I luv Queen Sandra
May 15, 2013 @ 6:58 am
I completely agree with all 5 of the points.. especially point 1 and 5. That is why this will always be a very weak season for me. Philippines was absolutely phenomenal. This season was complete garbage.
JT
May 21, 2013 @ 3:05 am
This season was way better than Phillipines on the sole reason that almost the entire cast of Phillipines sucked; Caramoan had an interesting and diverse cast however the amount of screen time each individual had was skewed.
tigervixxxen
May 15, 2013 @ 4:15 am
All good suggestions. Survivor used to be the gold standard of reunion shows. Great closure and made every person feel important to the game somehow. Now it’s become as pointless as the Big Brother finale. Which is such a shame after watching people every day for 70+ days and the jury system is a joke and the finale is a mess.
Anyway, my suggestion is that Survivor try a season where everyone lives together and there are no set tribes. Then before the first challenge of the “week” have them all draw colored rocks from the bag and get randomly assigned to a “tribe” for the week through the challenges and the vote. This way there would be drama and unpredictability each week plus there wouldn’t be the dynamic of one tribe getting the numbers at the merge and everyone coasting until the final 4.
I’ll keep an open mind that these favorites vs family dynamics will be interesting becuase it should greate tension of staying true to tribe alliance and family duo.