Comments on: Ratings debate: Can ABC’s ‘Revenge’ live to fight beyond season 2?

By: Susana Thomas

Susana Thomas — Mon, 15 Apr 2013 19:45:08 +0000

I agree- too many interruptions causes viewership to be lost. It would be a shame to lose this show. Such potential and great acting!

By: Ana Morales

Ana Morales — Mon, 08 Apr 2013 17:21:10 +0000

The problem is in the absence of sane writers. The feeling that the script write housewife, or fans in the Twitter. Actors almost don’t play. Solid demonstration of tasteless clothes of «Dynasty» times and almost no sense. The season 2 was the extra. The third is not needed at all. Otherwise they will fall into a complete idiocy. Mike Kelly was not ready to be showrunner. The show is designed for IQ below 100.

On the other hand such viewers enough too.

By: Joanne Smith

Joanne Smith — Mon, 08 Apr 2013 02:11:15 +0000

I personally like the weeknight time slot…not so many schedule interruptions as with a weekend slot…..there have been way too Many interruptions which makes it hard to stay involved…I have been a fan since day 1 but it’s been frustrating to have so so many breaks in the drama…….when a rerun must be shown, maybe a season recap would be good..it could draw new fans in…plus maybe more advertisement time with “teases” about upcoming episodes…just saying….I would be mad if show gets canceled for sure

By: diana

diana — Sun, 07 Apr 2013 19:08:01 +0000

those ratings were expected in the last airing
1)it was easter
2)the walking dead finale which garenered 12 million vieweres with a 6.4 ratings
3)the game of thrones premiere which got 4 million viewers with a 2.4 ratings
4) the bible finale which got 12 million viewers as well
i think that revenge will be renewed but im not really sure about its future beyond season 3