<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8216;Saturday Night Live&#8217; review: Samuel L. Jackson, Charlie Brown, Martin Short rule	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://cartermatt.com/43655/saturday-night-live-review-samuel-l-jackson-charlie-brown-martin-short-rule/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://cartermatt.com/43655/saturday-night-live-review-samuel-l-jackson-charlie-brown-martin-short-rule/</link>
	<description>TV News, Interviews, and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 15:23:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: deuce		</title>
		<link>https://cartermatt.com/43655/saturday-night-live-review-samuel-l-jackson-charlie-brown-martin-short-rule/#comment-86511</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[deuce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 14:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cartermatt.com/?p=43655#comment-86511</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great show overall though What&#039;s Up ran several minutes past funny. Good that Sir Paul gave us the Valentine tune instead of an old favorite...will take a couple of listenings to like it.  Now here&#039;s where the music production goes in the toilet--the head banging horribleness which was Paul&#039;s second number proved only that he never was and never will be a headbanger.  It also showed very poor judgment  by not having Paul&#039;s screaming followed by a good salt-water gargle and two days rest.  Instead he comes back with a ruined voice and non-working microphones to try to sing &quot;Wonderful Christmas Time.&quot;  The sound engineering of this last number was terrible, reminiscent of the big technical glitch at dress rehearsal of a high school concert.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great show overall though What&#8217;s Up ran several minutes past funny. Good that Sir Paul gave us the Valentine tune instead of an old favorite&#8230;will take a couple of listenings to like it.  Now here&#8217;s where the music production goes in the toilet&#8211;the head banging horribleness which was Paul&#8217;s second number proved only that he never was and never will be a headbanger.  It also showed very poor judgment  by not having Paul&#8217;s screaming followed by a good salt-water gargle and two days rest.  Instead he comes back with a ruined voice and non-working microphones to try to sing &#8220;Wonderful Christmas Time.&#8221;  The sound engineering of this last number was terrible, reminiscent of the big technical glitch at dress rehearsal of a high school concert.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AnonyMOUSE		</title>
		<link>https://cartermatt.com/43655/saturday-night-live-review-samuel-l-jackson-charlie-brown-martin-short-rule/#comment-86505</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AnonyMOUSE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 06:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cartermatt.com/?p=43655#comment-86505</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t forget about the short yelling at McCartney sketch turning into a rare third on stage McCartney performance that also involved the choir from the cold open (wonderful Christmas time)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget about the short yelling at McCartney sketch turning into a rare third on stage McCartney performance that also involved the choir from the cold open (wonderful Christmas time)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
