<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Succession episode 10 (finale) preview: Why the show is primed for a big future	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://cartermatt.com/320367/succession-episode-10-finale-preview-why-the-show-is-primed-for-a-big-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://cartermatt.com/320367/succession-episode-10-finale-preview-why-the-show-is-primed-for-a-big-future/</link>
	<description>TV News, Interviews, and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2023 22:19:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Maaz Kalim		</title>
		<link>https://cartermatt.com/320367/succession-episode-10-finale-preview-why-the-show-is-primed-for-a-big-future/#comment-164517</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maaz Kalim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2018 08:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://cartermatt.com/?p=320367#comment-164517</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Whoa, whoa, whoa...

Hold your horses!!! The issue is not much of a diamond under mine which you accidentally discovered!

As someone who&#039;s not an American yet watched enough of American TV, guess I can be confident to have a sound judgement. First of all, let me tell me you that non-linear original TV programming is so horrendous in my country that I totally rely on international programming as a means of escapism! (Ever heard of +PewDiePie, then guess I won&#039;t have to be embarrassed as the hint will do..)

So, first of all — blasé title! Couldn&#039;t. Agree. More. ?????? ???????? I remember that like almost-universal plots of family-legacy in my country&#039;s TV, there was an entire show dedicated to it. I wasn&#039;t that much into TV back in young age so I didn&#039;t gave much attention to that show but after a particular event (i.e. in a rarest event in my country&#039;s TV market, a show was shifted to another channel of the very same broadcaster to merely make way for a new season of local adaptation of &quot;WWTBAM&quot;), I was intrigued enough to try it out as the show got shifted from a higher-rated because mass-market, primary entertainment channel to its lower-rated because niche content offering sibling. I watched it and yawn, typical soap-opera where domestic-affairs are predominant over the productive-affairs! Left it ASAP.

When I heard this show, I first of all did see it as a not-so-serious show from its trailer (and a catchy beat among OSTs eerily similar to one of my favourite cinema-OSTs) and it got me a while (Thanks to my STML) to hit it that: the title is exactly (but not literally) an English translation of that show!

I thought: &lt;b&gt;Huh.. Poor HBO® is going into soap-opera business just like Showtime® already did and tasted success in ‘The Affair®, so much so that they&#039;re inadvertently plagiarizing a commercially-successfully=creatively-bankrupt [...] industry. Definitely not an iota of mistake given regardless of whatever the &#039;pop-Interweb&#039; may say and indeed believe, that&#039;s exactly what matters in real-universe! So I thought, huh..

Basically an Americanization of the idea, but since it&#039;s premium-cable: let&#039;s differentiate it by ADD: Profanity and coarse language (the most cost-effective for bumping up age-ratings!), Sex and Nudity! (it&#039;s HBO®, baby! They&#039;ll make you do it anyhow, if ‘True Detective®’ case is to be believed..) and Gore and Violence (since, obviously — to &quot;monkey-balance&quot; the preceding one, or are they somehow always connected for other reason?).
Clearly I missed &quot;Drug and Substances&quot; given my disinterest.

Tried watching, nah.. Couldn&#039;t get to watch episodes in full earlier and from whatever I watched, same old trite — no regrets to leave! Had nothing else to latch onto so came back at Episode 7&#039;s end, was definitely swayed by their execution of not-so-indigenous scene. (As said, I already watched bits-&#038;-pieces so had a fair-idea of what was going on, after all — it&#039;s not an arthouse to be subtle.)

Hooked ever since! Same old trite in a fresh new packaging and a new composite-flavour.. But who gives a [...], man?!? I love this soap-opera as it takes it inspiration from news-cycles and I&#039;ve noticed, they do have hired many experts (&quot;consultants&quot;) for the sake of authenticity.

Unlike ‘The Affair®’, this show really keeps things at sane-level and not making everything to be an excuse for characters-humping, i.e. &quot;premium-esque&quot; domestic-affairs. Even violence i.e. brawl on that show ultimately leads to bo––ng after touring the whole-universe. As if, every other setup and plot is just a filler to ultimately get dissolved in characters&#039; interpersonal mingling.

I wish this show indeed a much more success than ‘The Affair®’ — but given what I&#039;ve expressed, that seems practically unlikely.
Best served as a &quot;one-time watch&quot; for arthouse/indie audiences who&#039;re normal enough to not be absolutely-intolerant of refined-mediocrity. Think about ‘The Affairs®’ then [if this is &quot;one-time watch&quot; at best]?.. But Thankfully, they aren&#039;t huge in numbers so it doesn&#039;t matter much. Else, a show like ‘Here and Now’ would&#039;ve renewed much before this one.


So yes, ultimately I love this show as an engaging-fun but comparing it to such titles seems like an overreach. Although, I also do believe that ‘The Americans®’ is merely a glorified propaganda-lite being a foreign viewer but.. Well, did I tell that I also loved its theme music and its renditions?!? (Although, I happen to love most of the music from things I don&#039;t even care enough to watch, such as from an obscenely-rich production values of a mediocre story called ‘Game of Thrones®’.) And even worse, the arguably-cliché camera technique called &quot;Snap Zoom&quot; during oft-silent moments (&quot;dramatic silence&quot;) makes it more dramatically-appealing (notching up the &quot;dramatic feel&quot;) for me.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa, whoa, whoa&#8230;</p>
<p>Hold your horses!!! The issue is not much of a diamond under mine which you accidentally discovered!</p>
<p>As someone who&#8217;s not an American yet watched enough of American TV, guess I can be confident to have a sound judgement. First of all, let me tell me you that non-linear original TV programming is so horrendous in my country that I totally rely on international programming as a means of escapism! (Ever heard of +PewDiePie, then guess I won&#8217;t have to be embarrassed as the hint will do..)</p>
<p>So, first of all — blasé title! Couldn&#8217;t. Agree. More. ?????? ???????? I remember that like almost-universal plots of family-legacy in my country&#8217;s TV, there was an entire show dedicated to it. I wasn&#8217;t that much into TV back in young age so I didn&#8217;t gave much attention to that show but after a particular event (i.e. in a rarest event in my country&#8217;s TV market, a show was shifted to another channel of the very same broadcaster to merely make way for a new season of local adaptation of &#8220;WWTBAM&#8221;), I was intrigued enough to try it out as the show got shifted from a higher-rated because mass-market, primary entertainment channel to its lower-rated because niche content offering sibling. I watched it and yawn, typical soap-opera where domestic-affairs are predominant over the productive-affairs! Left it ASAP.</p>
<p>When I heard this show, I first of all did see it as a not-so-serious show from its trailer (and a catchy beat among OSTs eerily similar to one of my favourite cinema-OSTs) and it got me a while (Thanks to my STML) to hit it that: the title is exactly (but not literally) an English translation of that show!</p>
<p>I thought: <b>Huh.. Poor HBO® is going into soap-opera business just like Showtime® already did and tasted success in ‘The Affair®, so much so that they&#8217;re inadvertently plagiarizing a commercially-successfully=creatively-bankrupt [&#8230;] industry. Definitely not an iota of mistake given regardless of whatever the &#8216;pop-Interweb&#8217; may say and indeed believe, that&#8217;s exactly what matters in real-universe! So I thought, huh..</p>
<p>Basically an Americanization of the idea, but since it&#8217;s premium-cable: let&#8217;s differentiate it by ADD: Profanity and coarse language (the most cost-effective for bumping up age-ratings!), Sex and Nudity! (it&#8217;s HBO®, baby! They&#8217;ll make you do it anyhow, if ‘True Detective®’ case is to be believed..) and Gore and Violence (since, obviously — to &#8220;monkey-balance&#8221; the preceding one, or are they somehow always connected for other reason?).<br />
Clearly I missed &#8220;Drug and Substances&#8221; given my disinterest.</p>
<p>Tried watching, nah.. Couldn&#8217;t get to watch episodes in full earlier and from whatever I watched, same old trite — no regrets to leave! Had nothing else to latch onto so came back at Episode 7&#8217;s end, was definitely swayed by their execution of not-so-indigenous scene. (As said, I already watched bits-&amp;-pieces so had a fair-idea of what was going on, after all — it&#8217;s not an arthouse to be subtle.)</p>
<p>Hooked ever since! Same old trite in a fresh new packaging and a new composite-flavour.. But who gives a [&#8230;], man?!? I love this soap-opera as it takes it inspiration from news-cycles and I&#8217;ve noticed, they do have hired many experts (&#8220;consultants&#8221;) for the sake of authenticity.</p>
<p>Unlike ‘The Affair®’, this show really keeps things at sane-level and not making everything to be an excuse for characters-humping, i.e. &#8220;premium-esque&#8221; domestic-affairs. Even violence i.e. brawl on that show ultimately leads to bo––ng after touring the whole-universe. As if, every other setup and plot is just a filler to ultimately get dissolved in characters&#8217; interpersonal mingling.</p>
<p>I wish this show indeed a much more success than ‘The Affair®’ — but given what I&#8217;ve expressed, that seems practically unlikely.<br />
Best served as a &#8220;one-time watch&#8221; for arthouse/indie audiences who&#8217;re normal enough to not be absolutely-intolerant of refined-mediocrity. Think about ‘The Affairs®’ then [if this is &#8220;one-time watch&#8221; at best]?.. But Thankfully, they aren&#8217;t huge in numbers so it doesn&#8217;t matter much. Else, a show like ‘Here and Now’ would&#8217;ve renewed much before this one.</p>
<p>So yes, ultimately I love this show as an engaging-fun but comparing it to such titles seems like an overreach. Although, I also do believe that ‘The Americans®’ is merely a glorified propaganda-lite being a foreign viewer but.. Well, did I tell that I also loved its theme music and its renditions?!? (Although, I happen to love most of the music from things I don&#8217;t even care enough to watch, such as from an obscenely-rich production values of a mediocre story called ‘Game of Thrones®’.) And even worse, the arguably-cliché camera technique called &#8220;Snap Zoom&#8221; during oft-silent moments (&#8220;dramatic silence&#8221;) makes it more dramatically-appealing (notching up the &#8220;dramatic feel&#8221;) for me.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
