<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Doctor Who season 11 visual change coming &#8212; how will this season be different?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://cartermatt.com/278240/doctor-who-season-11-visual-change-coming-will-season-different/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://cartermatt.com/278240/doctor-who-season-11-visual-change-coming-will-season-different/</link>
	<description>TV News, Interviews, and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2017 21:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Peter Evans		</title>
		<link>https://cartermatt.com/278240/doctor-who-season-11-visual-change-coming-will-season-different/#comment-162521</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Evans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2017 21:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://cartermatt.com/?p=278240#comment-162521</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ah. The many, many fans and viewers who are opposed to this casting decision are simply mindlessly fomenting an &quot;unnecessary backlash.&quot; They couldn&#039;t possible have a reasoned and principled basis for their refusal to accept a blatantly ideologically-driven act of stunt casting, of course. So they must be thick, backward-looking misogynists. Probably racists too. 

The plummeting viewing figures during Capaldi&#039;s ill-fated tenure had nothing to do with the relentless, scornful Third Wave Feminist misandry that Moffat laced the scripts with. The abandonment by viewers wasn&#039;t remotely connected to venomous male-despising PC messaging, dressed up as ‘humour’. Dialogue that, had the genders been reversed, would have led to howls of outrage and demands for cancellation.

Parents love their little boys to hear this stuff while they’re watching TV entertainment so that they can learn just how vile and evil and stupid males are. 

The public clearly love having venomous misandrist Third Wave Feminist propaganda rammed down their throats while watching Doctor Who, just as they loved the radfem reboot of Ghostbusters in 2016. The only reason they turned away in droves was that there wasn&#039;t enough radfem propaganda in it, and it wasn&#039;t obtrusive enough. 

The Doctor has been a male character for 13 of his incarnations. If he could have flipped gender at any point (like flipping a coin), as that male radfem weasel Moffat wants us to believe, he’d have defied odds of 8,192 against in remaining male. So, casting a female Doctor couldn’t possible have anything to do with the present day’s undue, unaccountable, unelected, influence of Third Wave Feminism over corporate policy or its sequestered popularity amongst well-heeled virtue-signalling luvvies like Moffat and Chibnall.

Sorry, but those of us who despise this ugly supremacist hate movement, those of us who loathe its deranged identity politics and its pathological loathing of men and boys, will not be tuning in for either the Christmas Special or the new ‘Radical Feminist Propaganda Hour’ the show will become in 2018. No amount of new camera technology can rescue that.

RIP Doctor Who, November 1963-June 2017. A beloved sci-fi series and a peerless male role model slain on the altar of misandrist femiStalinism.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah. The many, many fans and viewers who are opposed to this casting decision are simply mindlessly fomenting an &#8220;unnecessary backlash.&#8221; They couldn&#8217;t possible have a reasoned and principled basis for their refusal to accept a blatantly ideologically-driven act of stunt casting, of course. So they must be thick, backward-looking misogynists. Probably racists too. </p>
<p>The plummeting viewing figures during Capaldi&#8217;s ill-fated tenure had nothing to do with the relentless, scornful Third Wave Feminist misandry that Moffat laced the scripts with. The abandonment by viewers wasn&#8217;t remotely connected to venomous male-despising PC messaging, dressed up as ‘humour’. Dialogue that, had the genders been reversed, would have led to howls of outrage and demands for cancellation.</p>
<p>Parents love their little boys to hear this stuff while they’re watching TV entertainment so that they can learn just how vile and evil and stupid males are. </p>
<p>The public clearly love having venomous misandrist Third Wave Feminist propaganda rammed down their throats while watching Doctor Who, just as they loved the radfem reboot of Ghostbusters in 2016. The only reason they turned away in droves was that there wasn&#8217;t enough radfem propaganda in it, and it wasn&#8217;t obtrusive enough. </p>
<p>The Doctor has been a male character for 13 of his incarnations. If he could have flipped gender at any point (like flipping a coin), as that male radfem weasel Moffat wants us to believe, he’d have defied odds of 8,192 against in remaining male. So, casting a female Doctor couldn’t possible have anything to do with the present day’s undue, unaccountable, unelected, influence of Third Wave Feminism over corporate policy or its sequestered popularity amongst well-heeled virtue-signalling luvvies like Moffat and Chibnall.</p>
<p>Sorry, but those of us who despise this ugly supremacist hate movement, those of us who loathe its deranged identity politics and its pathological loathing of men and boys, will not be tuning in for either the Christmas Special or the new ‘Radical Feminist Propaganda Hour’ the show will become in 2018. No amount of new camera technology can rescue that.</p>
<p>RIP Doctor Who, November 1963-June 2017. A beloved sci-fi series and a peerless male role model slain on the altar of misandrist femiStalinism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
