<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: NCIS season 15 ratings: What should expectations be for Mark Harmon, cast?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://cartermatt.com/268577/ncis-season-15-ratings-expectations-mark-harmon-cast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://cartermatt.com/268577/ncis-season-15-ratings-expectations-mark-harmon-cast/</link>
	<description>TV News, Interviews, and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 01:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Janet Furcello		</title>
		<link>https://cartermatt.com/268577/ncis-season-15-ratings-expectations-mark-harmon-cast/#comment-161040</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janet Furcello]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 01:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cartermatt.com/?p=268577#comment-161040</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Nielsen 18-49 Ratings and viewer numbers for all US broadcast scripted shows has been decreasing for over 40 years as alternative non-broadcast and recording went up--since the &quot;Gold Standard&quot; for Advertisers is Live + overnight--the decline in actual numbers has accelerated with delay-watching,alternative streaming and binge-watching rising.In the 2012-2013 season there was 1 show in the 5.0s (Big Bang Theory) 1 in the 4.0s-4 shows in the 3.0s and 23 shows in the 2.0s!! Last season 2016-2017 Big Bang Theory was still #1 in 18-49 Ratings-but at 3.11--the ONLY show to break 3.0s--and only 2 shows in the 2.0s. Bearing that in mind-NCIS&#039;s 1.72 keep it in the TopTen (38) of all broadcast scripted shows--I &#039;ll speculate that NCIS will probably be around 1.5 at the end of the season and STILL be in the TopTen--because all other shows are experiencing the same factors---likewise with viewer numbers.Everyone has  had drops from years ago--and NCIS STILL has more viewers tan anyone else--I expect them to retain that status! (P..S.-this season may very well find ZERO shows breaking 3.0!)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Nielsen 18-49 Ratings and viewer numbers for all US broadcast scripted shows has been decreasing for over 40 years as alternative non-broadcast and recording went up&#8211;since the &#8220;Gold Standard&#8221; for Advertisers is Live + overnight&#8211;the decline in actual numbers has accelerated with delay-watching,alternative streaming and binge-watching rising.In the 2012-2013 season there was 1 show in the 5.0s (Big Bang Theory) 1 in the 4.0s-4 shows in the 3.0s and 23 shows in the 2.0s!! Last season 2016-2017 Big Bang Theory was still #1 in 18-49 Ratings-but at 3.11&#8211;the ONLY show to break 3.0s&#8211;and only 2 shows in the 2.0s. Bearing that in mind-NCIS&#8217;s 1.72 keep it in the TopTen (38) of all broadcast scripted shows&#8211;I &#8216;ll speculate that NCIS will probably be around 1.5 at the end of the season and STILL be in the TopTen&#8211;because all other shows are experiencing the same factors&#8212;likewise with viewer numbers.Everyone has  had drops from years ago&#8211;and NCIS STILL has more viewers tan anyone else&#8211;I expect them to retain that status! (P..S.-this season may very well find ZERO shows breaking 3.0!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lee		</title>
		<link>https://cartermatt.com/268577/ncis-season-15-ratings-expectations-mark-harmon-cast/#comment-161032</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Sep 2017 09:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cartermatt.com/?p=268577#comment-161032</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Real life has distracted me from following the ratings for the 2nd half the season, but when I was last paying attention it seemed that the absolute numbers were pretty meaningless both in actual viewers and the demo.

Both have fallen off a cliff in relation to potential audience for a variety of reasons and the only real meaning in the figures now seems to be relative to other shows on the night and in the same week. Last time I looked NCIS was wiping the floor with most of its competition on the night and holding up pretty strong over the entire week. Even the re-runs were holding up strong against the competition. In the demo it seems rare for any show to beat a 2 now, although one or two dramatically bucked the trend.

Have Neilsen achieved anything in taking other metrics into consideration to create these figures yet?

That said, I think your predictions are realistic. It will be interesting to see how they stack up.

In addition to the age of the show, I think it has paid for having a stable cast for so many years - longer than the run of many shows - and once that stability was finally broken it&#039;s been hard to maintain the continuity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Real life has distracted me from following the ratings for the 2nd half the season, but when I was last paying attention it seemed that the absolute numbers were pretty meaningless both in actual viewers and the demo.</p>
<p>Both have fallen off a cliff in relation to potential audience for a variety of reasons and the only real meaning in the figures now seems to be relative to other shows on the night and in the same week. Last time I looked NCIS was wiping the floor with most of its competition on the night and holding up pretty strong over the entire week. Even the re-runs were holding up strong against the competition. In the demo it seems rare for any show to beat a 2 now, although one or two dramatically bucked the trend.</p>
<p>Have Neilsen achieved anything in taking other metrics into consideration to create these figures yet?</p>
<p>That said, I think your predictions are realistic. It will be interesting to see how they stack up.</p>
<p>In addition to the age of the show, I think it has paid for having a stable cast for so many years &#8211; longer than the run of many shows &#8211; and once that stability was finally broken it&#8217;s been hard to maintain the continuity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
