By: Kregg

Kregg — Thu, 21 Sep 2017 13:18:00 +0000

Hands down Paul is one of the best players of all time. Personally I feel Paul was even better than Derrick. Unlike Derrick, Paul didn’t have the luxury of laying back all season while he orchestrated his moves. Paul ran the house in BB19 in openness and never touched the block once. He had an amazing web of alliances and lies that he weaved to get him that far. Remember that Paul won his way into the final 2 in BB18 and Josh took Paul to final 2 in BB19 because he thought the jury disliked Paul more than him (which this pathetic jury did) and he would win, while Derrick had to rely on Cody’s loyalty to him to even get picked for final 2. Cody’s loyalty is admirable, but we all know if he chose Victoria then he would have won BB16 9-0. In my eyes Paul is above Derrick and even makes an argument to be in conversation with Dan Gheesling. Very strong point in this article about Paul’s weakness with the goodbye messages, I hadn’t considered that before reading, and this clearly cost him his game.

Comments on: Big Brother 19 debate: If Paul Abrahamian wins, what’s his legacy?

By: Kregg