<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Blue Bloods season 7 episode 17 review: Garrett Moore&#8217;s dangerous spotlight	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://cartermatt.com/246324/blue-bloods-season-7-episode-17-review-garrett-moores-spotlight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://cartermatt.com/246324/blue-bloods-season-7-episode-17-review-garrett-moores-spotlight/</link>
	<description>TV News, Interviews, and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 20:40:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Randma		</title>
		<link>https://cartermatt.com/246324/blue-bloods-season-7-episode-17-review-garrett-moores-spotlight/#comment-158301</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 11:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cartermatt.com/?p=246324#comment-158301</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://cartermatt.com/246324/blue-bloods-season-7-episode-17-review-garrett-moores-spotlight/#comment-158293&quot;&gt;Louis E.&lt;/a&gt;.

Thank you, again. 
I had suspected that Jamie stayed a beat cop so the show could have someone from the family at all levels of the legal system.
Your information about active plotlines really helps me understand the situation better.
I appreciate it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://cartermatt.com/246324/blue-bloods-season-7-episode-17-review-garrett-moores-spotlight/#comment-158293">Louis E.</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you, again.<br />
I had suspected that Jamie stayed a beat cop so the show could have someone from the family at all levels of the legal system.<br />
Your information about active plotlines really helps me understand the situation better.<br />
I appreciate it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Louis E.		</title>
		<link>https://cartermatt.com/246324/blue-bloods-season-7-episode-17-review-garrett-moores-spotlight/#comment-158293</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Louis E.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2017 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cartermatt.com/?p=246324#comment-158293</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://cartermatt.com/246324/blue-bloods-season-7-episode-17-review-garrett-moores-spotlight/#comment-158292&quot;&gt;Randma&lt;/a&gt;.

By having active plotlines that could easily explain a character being written out,they are telling the actors they are not essential.They
will give raises to the actors they think they really need and pay for it out of letting others go,if the total salary demands add up to more than their budget.

As for Jamie&#039;s lack of career progression,I think it&#039;s a case of their insisting on having a beat cop character no matter how unrealistic it is for him not to be promoted.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://cartermatt.com/246324/blue-bloods-season-7-episode-17-review-garrett-moores-spotlight/#comment-158292">Randma</a>.</p>
<p>By having active plotlines that could easily explain a character being written out,they are telling the actors they are not essential.They<br />
will give raises to the actors they think they really need and pay for it out of letting others go,if the total salary demands add up to more than their budget.</p>
<p>As for Jamie&#8217;s lack of career progression,I think it&#8217;s a case of their insisting on having a beat cop character no matter how unrealistic it is for him not to be promoted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Randma		</title>
		<link>https://cartermatt.com/246324/blue-bloods-season-7-episode-17-review-garrett-moores-spotlight/#comment-158292</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2017 21:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cartermatt.com/?p=246324#comment-158292</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://cartermatt.com/246324/blue-bloods-season-7-episode-17-review-garrett-moores-spotlight/#comment-158274&quot;&gt;Louis E.&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;m not familiar with entertainment &quot;politics&quot;.  Please give me an example of what kind of options the studio might be suggesting to cast members if the studio thinks the cast is asking for too much in the renegotiations.  Thank you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://cartermatt.com/246324/blue-bloods-season-7-episode-17-review-garrett-moores-spotlight/#comment-158274">Louis E.</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not familiar with entertainment &#8220;politics&#8221;.  Please give me an example of what kind of options the studio might be suggesting to cast members if the studio thinks the cast is asking for too much in the renegotiations.  Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Louis E.		</title>
		<link>https://cartermatt.com/246324/blue-bloods-season-7-episode-17-review-garrett-moores-spotlight/#comment-158274</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Louis E.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2017 21:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cartermatt.com/?p=246324#comment-158274</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://cartermatt.com/246324/blue-bloods-season-7-episode-17-review-garrett-moores-spotlight/#comment-158270&quot;&gt;Randma&lt;/a&gt;.

With the &quot;DeHavilland Rule&quot; limiting the length of employment by the studios to 7 years,and this being the 7th season of Blue Bloods,the cast are entitled to renegotiate...and the studio may be trying to make cast members feel there are other options in case they ask for too much.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://cartermatt.com/246324/blue-bloods-season-7-episode-17-review-garrett-moores-spotlight/#comment-158270">Randma</a>.</p>
<p>With the &#8220;DeHavilland Rule&#8221; limiting the length of employment by the studios to 7 years,and this being the 7th season of Blue Bloods,the cast are entitled to renegotiate&#8230;and the studio may be trying to make cast members feel there are other options in case they ask for too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Randma		</title>
		<link>https://cartermatt.com/246324/blue-bloods-season-7-episode-17-review-garrett-moores-spotlight/#comment-158270</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2017 16:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cartermatt.com/?p=246324#comment-158270</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What disappointed me about this episode was that the preview guide had been misleading.  It starts, &quot;Jamie and Eddie suspect foul play...&quot;, leading readers to think that BOTH of them would be involved in working to discover the truth.  

However, Eddie was in only the hospital scene.  Instead of portraying their great teamwork, the writers chose to focus on how Jamie basically should be a detective, even though he once again re-emphasized to a family member that he is happy as a beat cop.

Evidently, the writers are waiting until the last episode of this season to provide any resolution of the Jamie/Eddie relationship.   I&#039;m beginning to wish that the &quot;Personal Business&quot; episode would have been now, instead of last November.  It certainly makes things drag out.  I&#039;m getting tired of this long drawn out process.  

If Blue Bloods does not resolve this by the end of the season, they will have lost me, and I have been a FAITHFUL viewer since Season 1, Episode 1.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What disappointed me about this episode was that the preview guide had been misleading.  It starts, &#8220;Jamie and Eddie suspect foul play&#8230;&#8221;, leading readers to think that BOTH of them would be involved in working to discover the truth.  </p>
<p>However, Eddie was in only the hospital scene.  Instead of portraying their great teamwork, the writers chose to focus on how Jamie basically should be a detective, even though he once again re-emphasized to a family member that he is happy as a beat cop.</p>
<p>Evidently, the writers are waiting until the last episode of this season to provide any resolution of the Jamie/Eddie relationship.   I&#8217;m beginning to wish that the &#8220;Personal Business&#8221; episode would have been now, instead of last November.  It certainly makes things drag out.  I&#8217;m getting tired of this long drawn out process.  </p>
<p>If Blue Bloods does not resolve this by the end of the season, they will have lost me, and I have been a FAITHFUL viewer since Season 1, Episode 1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Louis E.		</title>
		<link>https://cartermatt.com/246324/blue-bloods-season-7-episode-17-review-garrett-moores-spotlight/#comment-158268</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Louis E.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2017 04:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cartermatt.com/?p=246324#comment-158268</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The complete idiocy,I&#039;d say,was her trying to run Danny down with her car (which lets her be charged with attempted murder of a police officer on top of everything else) when he told her to get out of it.
Though if simply being a complete idiot has been criminalized we&#039;ll have to build more prisons.

(Rather garbled presentation of that case...the arrested woman was the partner/lover of an EMT whose wife died because she took an overdose of medication the lover had given the husband to give the wife,before not letting the husband respond to the distress call).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The complete idiocy,I&#8217;d say,was her trying to run Danny down with her car (which lets her be charged with attempted murder of a police officer on top of everything else) when he told her to get out of it.<br />
Though if simply being a complete idiot has been criminalized we&#8217;ll have to build more prisons.</p>
<p>(Rather garbled presentation of that case&#8230;the arrested woman was the partner/lover of an EMT whose wife died because she took an overdose of medication the lover had given the husband to give the wife,before not letting the husband respond to the distress call).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
