Comments on: Discussing the ‘Outlander’ season 3 split-season idea

By: Christine Smilak

Christine Smilak — Mon, 06 Feb 2017 01:37:00 +0000

I think that we fans should just take a chill pill and just be patient. Ron Moore knows what is best for everything Outlander. We would not want to jeopardize the quality and performances of the actors and crew in order for Outlander to premier in April. I say lets all take a deep breath and a dose of patience and see what happens. I would rather get to see a very high quality Outlander that I have grown to expect from Ron Moore than a poor quality Outlander. Ron Moore do what you have to do. We will be patient. Actors and crew keep doing your ever present great jobs. Us fans will wait for the Outlander for the quality we know and love.

By: PunkRockOldLady

PunkRockOldLady — Sun, 05 Feb 2017 17:04:00 +0000

In reply to distachio. It was easier to split in season 1 because there were 16 episodes.

By: distachio

distachio — Sun, 05 Feb 2017 08:10:00 +0000

Whoever wrote this article seems either not to know, or has forgotten, that this exact thing was done in Season 1, and NO ONE was happy. I hope STARZ makes the right choice. Start later and give fans 13 top-quality episodes in direct succession. NO BREAKS IN THE MIDDLE, please!

By: Dana

Dana — Sat, 04 Feb 2017 20:56:00 +0000

Outlander fans are waiting years for the 9th book. A few more months for the Series isn’t a big deal. A quality product, a well told story and actors that aren’t performing under pressure are what is most important.

By: Barbara Miller

Barbara Miller — Sat, 04 Feb 2017 18:15:00 +0000

Ron knows best. He’ll make a good decision about this.