<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8216;Gotham&#8217; season 2, episode 16 review: A tale of two stories	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://cartermatt.com/200503/gotham-season-2-episode-16-review-tale-two-stories/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://cartermatt.com/200503/gotham-season-2-episode-16-review-tale-two-stories/</link>
	<description>TV News, Interviews, and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: reader		</title>
		<link>https://cartermatt.com/200503/gotham-season-2-episode-16-review-tale-two-stories/#comment-153461</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[reader]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cartermatt.com/?p=200503#comment-153461</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I was tuning in for Ben McKenzie&#039;s Gordon story and wasn&#039;t disappointed, mainly because I was anticipating the level of the acting, namely the turn to character-driven and subtle, emotional focus.  That has always been Ben McKenzie&#039;s calling card, something he&#039;s had little chance to display on this show.  That kind of compelling material and a focus on Gordon as a person and his relationships, even just scratching the surface, was what mattered most to me.  I just wish there was more of it and hope that there will be.

Agreed re:  the other.  It was odd in a black comedy and predictable way.

As for the twists and  surprises, they were great, with Falcone, although too brief, unless he sticks around.  I always liked Ben McKenzie&#039;s and John Doman&#039;s scenes, especially the ones about personal story and background.  Too, too few.  Jim and Harvey are always gold.  I was hoping for more about Jim and Lee, and am still am, not believing what Harvey told Jim and hoping for far better- eventually.  Even the guard, vilified Loeb-connected warden and his pet inmates weren&#039;t just stereotypes, or the acting elevated the best parts.  The Jim/Puck and Jim and the guard, especially, were highlights.  This is one to watch again.

Thanks for recapping and reviewing!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was tuning in for Ben McKenzie&#8217;s Gordon story and wasn&#8217;t disappointed, mainly because I was anticipating the level of the acting, namely the turn to character-driven and subtle, emotional focus.  That has always been Ben McKenzie&#8217;s calling card, something he&#8217;s had little chance to display on this show.  That kind of compelling material and a focus on Gordon as a person and his relationships, even just scratching the surface, was what mattered most to me.  I just wish there was more of it and hope that there will be.</p>
<p>Agreed re:  the other.  It was odd in a black comedy and predictable way.</p>
<p>As for the twists and  surprises, they were great, with Falcone, although too brief, unless he sticks around.  I always liked Ben McKenzie&#8217;s and John Doman&#8217;s scenes, especially the ones about personal story and background.  Too, too few.  Jim and Harvey are always gold.  I was hoping for more about Jim and Lee, and am still am, not believing what Harvey told Jim and hoping for far better- eventually.  Even the guard, vilified Loeb-connected warden and his pet inmates weren&#8217;t just stereotypes, or the acting elevated the best parts.  The Jim/Puck and Jim and the guard, especially, were highlights.  This is one to watch again.</p>
<p>Thanks for recapping and reviewing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
