Comments on: ABC’s ‘Castle’ season 7, episode 20 review: Why did Richard Castle disappear?

By: phealy1

phealy1 — Sat, 25 Apr 2015 23:29:00 +0000

I believe all of our questions will be answered from the show runners. They have never let us hang before. They won’t start now. The main thing – BE PATIENT.

By: Gremlin

Gremlin — Wed, 22 Apr 2015 02:13:00 +0000

I didn’t really care for this episode. The story seemed like someone was making it up as they went along. There is still a lot left unanswered, and it doesn’t explain why Castle said he didn’t want to remember. But my biggest issue was that it felt like it was flat… Castle and Beckett’s relationship, the story of his disappearance, the humor (besides a few funny moments, though I understand that it wasn’t set as a funny episode). I much prefer the previous episode, Habeas Corpse, as it had the charm, humor, and spark that I love about the show. I’m hoping that there is something else to it, but even still, this seems like a waste of an episode to me.

By: Niallerz1992

Niallerz1992 — Tue, 21 Apr 2015 19:13:00 +0000

I was satisfied with this episode. The reasons behind the abduction, I was happy with and the back-story to why he was abducted were good too. There are a few unanswered questions: Line the missing two months and why Castle deposited money at a drop location and the meaning behind Hollanders Wood.
The episode wasn’t a let down, I was totally satisfied with the episode and I am looking forward to what happens next with the case.