<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8216;Supernatural&#8217; season 9 spoilers: The Ghostfacers return in &#8216;#THINMAN&#8217;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://cartermatt.com/109639/supernatural-season-9-spoilers-the-ghostfacers-return-in-thinman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://cartermatt.com/109639/supernatural-season-9-spoilers-the-ghostfacers-return-in-thinman/</link>
	<description>TV News, Interviews, and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Feb 2014 14:34:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Pamela Watson		</title>
		<link>https://cartermatt.com/109639/supernatural-season-9-spoilers-the-ghostfacers-return-in-thinman/#comment-131395</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pamela Watson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Feb 2014 03:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cartermatt.com/?p=109639#comment-131395</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve never really appreciated the Ghostfacers.  They were originally filler for the writer&#039;s strike in season 3.  Their second episode didn&#039;t do anything to make them more interesting.  I&#039;m not too excited to see them again unless the writers move them away from the &#039;tongue in cheek&#039; mode.  They should give them some depth or relevance.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never really appreciated the Ghostfacers.  They were originally filler for the writer&#8217;s strike in season 3.  Their second episode didn&#8217;t do anything to make them more interesting.  I&#8217;m not too excited to see them again unless the writers move them away from the &#8216;tongue in cheek&#8217; mode.  They should give them some depth or relevance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
