<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8216;The Sing-Off&#8217; season 4, episode 4 review: Did Element, VoicePlay, or Vocal Rush go home?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://cartermatt.com/100446/the-sing-off-season-4-episode-4-review-did-element-voiceplay-or-vocal-rush-go-home/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://cartermatt.com/100446/the-sing-off-season-4-episode-4-review-did-element-voiceplay-or-vocal-rush-go-home/</link>
	<description>TV News, Interviews, and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 09:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: idisagree		</title>
		<link>https://cartermatt.com/100446/the-sing-off-season-4-episode-4-review-did-element-voiceplay-or-vocal-rush-go-home/#comment-129341</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[idisagree]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 09:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cartermatt.com/?p=100446#comment-129341</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[if you would like to be taken seriously, you should learn the meaning of the word rational as well as include the names of all four groups in the title, rather than play on the cute assumption that one group had &quot;no chance&quot; of being eliminated, no matter how true it might be. I personally thought there were two groups that had no chance of being eliminated and I was right and I think most people felt the same way, per the consensus. I&#039;m sure people felt differently, including yourself, but your title is a turn off to anyone who didn&#039;t feel exactly like you did. and not provoking which would be ok, and even encouraged. if your title is to make any sense, and you&#039;re to come off as knowing anything about a-cappella music, then take voiceplay out of the title, move them to number two, and have it read, did element or vocal rush go home? then talk about the amazing technique involved in voiceplay&#039;s performance, their skill in dynamics/arrangement, pair that with bringing to light the obvious drooling that we all do when a group sings a popular song with an &quot;ear friendly&quot; feel good melody, or does something &quot;really cool&quot; like hit an incredible note (which made my ears very happy mind you) and then you&#039;ve got the beginnings of a compelling piece, void of bias and posturing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you would like to be taken seriously, you should learn the meaning of the word rational as well as include the names of all four groups in the title, rather than play on the cute assumption that one group had &#8220;no chance&#8221; of being eliminated, no matter how true it might be. I personally thought there were two groups that had no chance of being eliminated and I was right and I think most people felt the same way, per the consensus. I&#8217;m sure people felt differently, including yourself, but your title is a turn off to anyone who didn&#8217;t feel exactly like you did. and not provoking which would be ok, and even encouraged. if your title is to make any sense, and you&#8217;re to come off as knowing anything about a-cappella music, then take voiceplay out of the title, move them to number two, and have it read, did element or vocal rush go home? then talk about the amazing technique involved in voiceplay&#8217;s performance, their skill in dynamics/arrangement, pair that with bringing to light the obvious drooling that we all do when a group sings a popular song with an &#8220;ear friendly&#8221; feel good melody, or does something &#8220;really cool&#8221; like hit an incredible note (which made my ears very happy mind you) and then you&#8217;ve got the beginnings of a compelling piece, void of bias and posturing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
